Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided via the decision of the Supreme Court during the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are missing within the present case. In such circumstances, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
Because of the recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been feasible under the previous Model on the legislation.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of sooner or later from the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness from the alleged event along with the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened being the real brothers of your deceased but they did not react in the least towards the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, one particular after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a great number of instances that extra judicial confession of an accused is actually a weak style of evidence which could possibly be manoeuvred via the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is usually relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other on the motorcycle at 4.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID essential) to criminal and traffic case information during the general district courts with the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
Individual researchers working on defined research projects meant for scholarly work can use the hooked up form (PDF) to request PACER fee exemptions from multiple courts.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as click here no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it acceptable into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's well-settled that even though contemplating the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should consider the advantage of each of the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates who are found to get most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded from the respondent department just to increase favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part with the respondent department.
There are many scenarios where death was never supposed – even more where Those people nominated while in the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being is usually a tragic event. But the death of any residing being is no significantly less a tragic event.
Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
Please note, For anyone who is seeking a price exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation is often applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
She did note that the boy still needed comprehensive therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being safe with other children.” The boy was receiving counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved of the actions.
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or perhaps to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are recognized by executive companies based on statutes.